Being Released from What You Have Been Calling Reality
Dream, reality, imagination. Different things but maybe imagination is similar to dreams, they are both distinguished from reality, aren’t they? Reality then is what we perceive with our senses and what instruments of measurement have observed, right?
So we can start from the latter. Human beings have 5 senses:
Sight – Light energy detected by the eyes
Hearing – Sound energy detected by the ears
Smell – Chemical energy and shape of molecules detected by the nose
Taste – Chemical energy detected by the tongue
Touch – Pressure energy detected by the skin
These 5 senses provide the information to the brain in order to understand the outside world.
However, what are the senses in fact detecting? Aren’t all of them detecting energy?
Everything in the Universe is made up of energy
Quantum Physics states that everything that exists in the whole universe is made up of energy that constantly flows and changes form.
Think that you swim in the sea or in a lake. In the water is you, several microorganisms, small fish, big fish, dust, small plants and so many other organisms or small and big objects. So you and all these together with the water you look like you are connected, like all of you together form something.
So even when you aren’t in the water there are molecules of air around you, there are smells and maybe insects around your skin which are connected to the others and so on.
Thus we somehow drown in a “lake” of energy that contains several different parts, right?
The Brain as a receiver and creator of a concept (through the senses) according to its specifications
So what follows is that the brain perceives this information and creates a model of reality. You can easily understand that this happens every single moment. The energy “moves” and changes form so the senses unstoppably receive the new info, create a concept of reality again and again. Remember that the percepts are received filtered or unfiltered and shape the concept.
But all this time we haven’t specified something. What light energy do the eyes recognise, for example? Light energy is very general. If all our senses were capturing every kind of energy then the brain would overflow and we would die in the blink of an eye from electric shock.
The waves of energy can be defined by their frequency (f) or wavelength (λ), one of the two is enough as they are inversely related if you know the phase velocity (υ). The formula that connects them is:
f=u/λ
Apart from that, we also learnt at school very well that the eye can recognise waves between the ultraviolet and the infrared. This means that the eye can only notice wavelengths of 400nm-700nm. Also, for example, the wavelengths that humans define as green are 495–570 nm. When the rays of light reflect on a leaf and our eyes receive light of such wavelengths then we say that the leaf is green. Everything above 700nm and below 400nm is like isn’t happening and not existing for our eyes. But if we wear infrared glasses then a different world appears in front of our eyes, because we are using an observation object of different specifications. For example, we can use a machine to see soundwaves.
Similarly, the ear responds to specific wavelengths, the nose, as well, and so on.
If you haven’t thought about these things before but make some sense to you, maybe you will have understood by now that when your senses don’t catch something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
The Subjectivity of Human Biology
At the same time think for example that the dogs don’t recognise the colors same as humans. So when we see a red object the dog cannot see it the same way as you. How can you be the one defining what something “is” and not another observer of it?
But even in human beings. In experiments among many people, when asked to define the specific color hue of an object they just saw, they were having many different answers.
The above provide a certainty about the great subjectivity of biology itself to define reality. We mostly used to think that there is subjectivity in our thinking but in my understanding, not too many have really dived so far to confront that great issue.
Some say that we have science to go beyond these limitations of human biology. But who is science? Isn’t science made of people? This by itself means that even if the most spectacular imagination and technology is used to process a huge amount of variables in order to explain reality, how can we be sure that still they aren’t missing something that has to be measured and influences the results of the measurement of other phenomena? I mean from what we know till know, as I am convinced that what we always learn as new is very outdated.
But the majority of science at the moment doesn’t even seem to be going towards this direction as they are keeping defining reality as the concept created by the senses and the instruments whose specifications unavoidably are created with the use of the human senses.
Everything is practically connected
So there isn’t any empty space. Our body isn’t disconnected by anything else by the skin, as we said, there are molecules of air connected to it which are connected with others and so on and so forth. Like being in a lake, I think the water that has more substance can make it more understood.
At each moment the senses receive the energy and according to the specifications that define the human brain create a concept. This is a concept of 3 dimensions. The first dimension is the length or one-dimensional cube ie the movement of a point A perpendicular to itself. The second dimension is the square, the two-dimensional cube, that is the movement of a line perpendicular to itself. The third dimension: is the three-dimensional cube, i.e., the movement of the layer perpendicular to itself.
What is Time
Every single moment the brain crystallises a 3-dimensional concept as reality. However, the senses make us believe that there is a continuation in that although is crystallisation upon crystallisation, like the frames of a video.
So in this 3dimensional concept that comes as a result of the human brain’s characteristics the ancient civilizations noticed some patterns. For example, the earth was going around the sun. Thus they created time. They found the year that is one circle of the earth around the sun. The divisions of the year and other natural phenomena created days, hours, weeks and so on. Since the human senses cannot sense the 4th dimension we recognise it through its secondary characteristics and that’s why we use seconds. Else we would again measure it in metres like the other 3.
We have used the natural phenomena to find an anchor to measure time. Because we live in the now. The memory defines time. Time is just a series of nows. Time is NOW, NOW, NOW. When we recall that again in a now, it’s only our memory and our perception of ourselves as a separate entity that makes it look like “time has passed.” Because, as well, we aren’t separate entities, it’s only that our eyes weren’t made to see the air that connects us.
I know these may be a bit unusual ideas and not easily digested because we live on the 4th dimension. That’s why we cannot easily understand this concept through our senses.
The real Plato’s Cave
Maybe this is the Plato’s cave, the world of the senses. Because in this world there is suffering. Because we have forgotten the reality and fully trust our senses, we behave very egoistically. In the 3-dimensional world of the human senses there is division. In order to operate the brain has evolved to have specific characteristics so it defines separate objects. This way you can name them and live. You can see the chair, the basket, me, the house. But all of these aren’t objects disconnected to everything else, because nothing is, all are one.
You see then what is going on on earth at the moment? We suffer because we are so fanatics with division. We are divided because of ideas, skin color, culture, religion. People die defending what they are against what they are not. Defending what they have against what they have not. But all of this can’t be true as we said. This division comes as a result of the human senses, it’s not real!
We see also people being compared. What exactly are they comparing, they aren’t something different, we all have similarities in a basic level but our blossoming is totally different and it is so vague to just be characterised by labels. We are talking about a pool of energies of different frequencies. All of them are one thing, energy, and they are only defined by their frequency which is constantly changing.
But people seem totally to have lost sense of the reality. They become so much polarised on different sides and fight till death. Maybe that’s why Socrates said that bad actions are a result of lack of knowledge. Else, you can easily understand that it doesn’t make sense to want bad things to happen to something that is actually a part of you. Only a self-destructive person would for example like his legs to not be working.
It also needs to be mentioned that all solids aren’t actually so full of substance as they look to our eyes. Since the majority of the space inside the atom isn’t used by the electrons, protons and neutrons that it consists of and all objects are made of atoms you can easily conclude the above.
As well, Einstein had found that when the space of the third dimension curves to the fourth dimension beyond a boundary, then our senses perceive this curvature as the density of matter. However, since space is “nothing”, matter is a curved nothing. Also, from Einstein we know that mass and energy are equivalent and identical.
From the above you can start understanding that what we call matter is just a perception of energy flow and an illusion that comes from our senses. It’s not difficult then to conclude how much immature it looks when we give such levels of importance to concepts of what we call matter which are created by our senses in a very constrained matrix.

Really interesting ideas here!
I think you’ve really got to the root of the subjective nature of objects and division. The floor may be real and the table may be real, but where the floor ends and the table begins is a matter of social convention.
In some ways natural selection favours entities that perceive division. If I had no preference to the configuration of matter that is my body being alive as opposed to rotting in the ground, I probably wouldn’t go to all the effort to wash myself, cook, look left and right before crossing the road or try to earn money.
Pure physics is apathetic to the difference between life and death.
To a certain extent, the process of natural selection tend to produce creatures with a strong preference to promoting the continuation of the configuration of matter which represents a healthy version of themselves as well as reproducing it. We’re hard programmed to perceive a difference between the self and the environment and hold the self to be of greater importance than the environment. When as you said, it’s all matter and energy.
Finally, string theory is very disturbing in many ways. It is completely different to quantum mechanics, yet describes the same universe!
What if an infinite quantity of alternative theories describe the exact same experience??? Our only way to distinguish between the truth claims of rival theories is experiment, but unless experiments only leave one theory standing at the of the day (something that is far from guaranteed) then we may never know the underlying truth behind everything at all.
Thank you for your reply, John and for the great points. The fact itself that natural selection favors beings that see the world in a “division perspective”, which as you said is unavoidable in order to survive this world, shows which is the road to maturity.
In my view, maybe wisdom for a human is the understanding in practice that this tendency for ego perseverance is not much more than an illusion, actually a rule that defines how the game is played in this “sub reality”. But it seems that the larger reality is the opposite, is the connection between everything and the fact that the good of others is almost equally important to our own good. As well, putting a high importance in the matter is a very misinformed perspective as a knowledgeable being wouldn’t put so much value to an illusion.
Thus it’s so much of importance to learn to perceive the world beyond our so much limited senses.
Gosto de ler os artigos de Ângelo!
Sempre interessantes!
Gosto de ciência, e, procuro sempre, acompanhar novas teorias, novos experimentos… Sempre com uma atitude crítica, questionando!ohn ohn
Concordo com Angelo, mas, como John McCone, bem referiu, julgo que o Homem, nunca tomara conhecimento, de verdades subjacentes a tudo!
Muito, já temos conhecimento, provas, mas, tanto para ter certezas!
Teoria das cordas, Multiversos… Algum dia teremos certezas??!! O que se passa num buraco negro, depois do horizonte de eventos…….
Obrigada, Ângelo, e John
Obrigado por parar por Fátima e pelas suas amáveis palavras.
Por definição, não podemos dar como certo algo que não foi provado, mas, por outro lado, a maneira como a ciência funciona torna difícil provar ou até mesmo observar certos processos. É por isso que não podemos tirar nossas obsrvações individuais da equação.
Da mesma forma, é importante, numa perspectiva científica, não nos limitarmos às descobertas atuais, uma vez que a ciência opera sob a abertura de que há mais a ser encontrado e compreendido no futuro. Esse é o ponto, nosso conhecimento cresce, nossa compreensão se torna melhor e assim por diante.
Além disso, já existem achados suficientes que eu acho que provam claramente que a matéria é apenas um tipo de energia que é subjetivamente entendida dessa maneira devido às especificações de nossos sentidos. A busca e a discussão são para elementos mais profundos do que isso.
Por fim, a meu ver, há muito conhecimento oculto que foi encontrado por nossos ancestrais ou é encontrado até hoje. Veja, por exemplo, as histórias sobre Nicola Tesla ou várias civilizações que prosperaram e não podemos nem hoje entender por quê. Não podemos saber, infelizmente, todos os importantes entendimentos da humanidade e não podemos ser deixados pelos governantes do mundo, pois isso definitivamente faria os humanos se sentirem muito mais poderosos e menos dependentes deles.